Legal Opinion

Charles R. Steib v. Lamorak Insurance Company

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 2021No. 2020-CA-0424Published

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES R. STEIB * NO. 2020-CA-0424 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL LAMORAK INSURANCE * FOURTH CIRCUIT COMPANY, ET AL. * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* SCJ JENKINS, J., DISSENTS WITH REASONS I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Plaintiffs presented insufficient evidence of causation to create a genuine issue of material fact as to that essential element of their claims. According to the majority, Plaintiffs were unable to present “some evidence” linking the presence of asbestos-containing materials with the work that Mr. Steib performed for Parsons at Marathon during the 1975…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. SOUTH CENT. BELL TELEPHONE v. Rouse Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Van v. FerrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Patterson v. Al Copeland Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API