Charles R. Steib v. Lamorak Insurance Company
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES R. STEIB * NO. 2020-CA-0424 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL LAMORAK INSURANCE * FOURTH CIRCUIT COMPANY, ET AL. * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* SCJ JENKINS, J., DISSENTS WITH REASONS I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Plaintiffs presented insufficient evidence of causation to create a genuine issue of material fact as to that essential element of their claims. According to the majority, Plaintiffs were unable to present “some evidence” linking the presence of asbestos-containing materials with the work that Mr. Steib performed for Parsons at Marathon during the 1975…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- SOUTH CENT. BELL TELEPHONE v. Rouse Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Van v. FerrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Patterson v. Al Copeland Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996