Legal Opinion
(PC) Chester v. King
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 23, 2019No. 1:16-cv-01257Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND D. CHESTER, 1:16-cv-01257-DAD-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS KING, SANDHU AND WITHROW’S REQUEST TO 13 vs. SEAL EXHIBITS (ECF No. 37-9.) 14 AUDREY KING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Raymond D. Chester (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 21 pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with 22 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint filed on August 31, 2016, against defendants Audrey King 23…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kamakana v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Angela K. Hagestad v. Roger C. Tragesser v. Oregon State Bar, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States Ex Rel. Gadbois v. PharMerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978