Ferguson v. Glassford
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from St. Clair, (Stevens, J.) Bill filed to foreclose a mortgage, alleged to have been discharged by mistake. Complainant appeals from decree dis- missing bill. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
In this case it is conceded that the written ■discharge of the mortgage bearing date the sixth day of January, 1879, executed by. Archibald Maxwell and Ann Maxwell to John Allen, was placed upon record by mistake. The defendant George Glassford purchased the land from Maxwell on March 10, 1883, and the only question is whether he had .-actual notice that the mortgage was an existing incumbrance ■notwithstanding the record. To this question of fact most of the testimony was directed. The burden of proof was upon the complainant to establish the fact of notice-; and to the better understanding…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sidener v. PaveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Lowbey v. ByersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Sheldon v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by13 opinions
- Swasey v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Feld v. Roanoke Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Jackson, Lansing & Saginaw Railroad v. DavisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Benson v. MarkoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- E. B. Millar & Co. v. OlneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.