Legal Opinion

Reed v. Carlyle & Martin, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 4, 1974No. Record 730378, 730379 and 730382PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarrico, J.

The plaintiff, Grayson C. Reed, was injured when he fell into the moving parts of a piece of farm equipment. He brought a separate action for damages against each of the defendants: Grove Manufacturing Company, the manufacturer of the equipment; Carlyle & Martin, Inc., the seller of the equipment; and Carlyle & Anderson, Inc., a repairer of farm equipment.

Discovery depositions were taken of the plaintiff and others. After the parties were at issue, the defendants filed motions for summary judgment, alleging that the depositions showed the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Starnes v. StofferahnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Budzinski v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  3. Blunk v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. C. & M. PROMOTIONS v. RylandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  5. Keith v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Turner v. Manning, Maxwell & Moore, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  2. Peters v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API