Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 10, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

— There is no error assigned because of any discrepancies occurring at the trial on the indictment. Attack, however, is centered, first, on the court’s assumption of jiiris-diction, and second, on alleged errors said .to . , ... have been committed during the examination of . the appellant s soundness of mind, to determine whether or not the main cause should proceed.

On April 1, 1925, the grand jury of Allamakee County returned “the indictment” in question against D. J. Murphy, the appellant, whereupon he was arrested, and furnished bail for his appearance. Afterwards appellant, on April 8th,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Manatt v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  3. Fleming v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Cooper v. BridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Stone v. ConradSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MacHovecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Boyles v. CoraSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Madsen v. ObermannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  4. State v. MaharrasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. State v. GaffneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API