Legal Opinion

Boehmer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 5, 1985No. 84-1618PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, Chief Judge.

We affirm on the basis that the trial court’s departure from the sentencing guidelines does not require a written statement if a sufficient reason for that departure is stated orally at the sentencing hearing and transcribed. See Burke v. State, 456 S.2d 1245 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Rutlin v. State, 455 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Carter v. State, 452 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Brady v. State, 457 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Klapp v. State, 456 So.2d 970 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). But see Boynton v. State, 473 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Jackson v. State, 454 So.2d 691…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Boynton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Brady v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Klapp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vance v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Boehmer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API