Legal Opinion

Layton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1973No. 9405PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

Appellant and his “fall partner” James W. Hendrix were jointly charged and tried for burglary in the first degree and stealing. A jury found both guilty and on direct appeal the judgments of conviction were affirmed. State v. Hendrix, 454 S.W.2d 40 (Mo.1970). Subsequently appellant sought postconviction relief in a proceeding under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., which was denied after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, we will consider those points properly briefed. McQueen v. State, 475 S.W.2d 111, 115 [3] (Mo. banc 1971).

In his brief, the appellant treats his first two points as one,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Knorp v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. McQueen v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  4. Funk v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tollison v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Mercer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Haynes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. State v. HawkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. State v. ThomastonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API