State ex rel. Spring Water Co. v. Town of Monroe
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered May 27, 1905, in favor of the defendants, on the pleadings, dismissing an application for a writ of mandamus to compel a town to grant a permit for the extension of a water system.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.
The appellant here applied to the court below for a writ of mandate against the mayor and town council of the town of Monroe. The application for the writ sets *546forth the following facts: That the relator is a corporation organized and existing nnder the laws of the state of Washington; that, on the 17th day of June, 1901, the board of county commissioners of Snohomish county granted to the relator the right, privilege, authority, and franchise to lay down and maintain a line or lines of water mains or pipes, along streets and alleys in Monroe and Tyee City, in said Snohomish county, and along…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arnott v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. City of PullmanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Spokane Street Railway Co. v. City of Spokane FallsWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Detroit v. Detroit City Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1894
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Neils v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Franklin County v. CarstensWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Jones v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Sasse v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.