Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Owen

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 15, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Proceedings upon an accounting by an executor.

1Opinion of the Court

Abbott, S.

In the proceeding to probate this will, I held that the testimony of the two subscribing witnesses, Slandorff and Parrish, was sufficient to warrant probate being granted in every respect, except as to the identity of the testator; and opportunity was afforded the proponents to introduce further testimony upon that point alone. •

Such testimony was afterwards satisfactorily supplied and I then permitted-Mr. Owen’s testimony to be stricken from the record, as he was a beneficiary under the will, and by testifying was presumed to have forfeited his legacy.

The Appellate Division (Matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Caw v. . RobertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  2. In re BeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Cornwell v. WooleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of BrattNew York Surrogate's Court · 1894
  2. Estate of Zeile, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API