Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marks v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 18, 1960Published

1DissentEager, J.

I concur in reversal of the judgment in favor of plaintiff, but dissent insofar as the court would grant plaintiff a new trial. I vote to dismiss the complaint, and consequently also to dismiss the third-party complaint.

The plaintiff did not establish a case either under the provisions of section 200 or section 240 of the Labor Law, nor on the theory of common-law negligence.

The trial court concluded that there was no basis here for the submission of this case to the jury on theory of negligence in violation by defendant New York City Transit Authority of section 200 of the Labor Law; and it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Broderick v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Komar v. Dun & Bradstreet Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Marshall v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Benning v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. Marks v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API