Legal Opinion

Congoleum Industries, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 41762PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HANNUM, District Judge.

Presently before the court are applications by the defendant (1) for leave to conduct certain inter partes tests and (2) for leave pursuant to Rule 32(a) (3) (E) Fed.R.Civ.P. to use depositions taken during those inter partes tests in court proceedings.

This is an action charging defendant with infringement of two patents which are directed to a process for making chemically embossed foamed vinyl floor coverings. Defendant has denied that the process used in its manufacture of commercial floor coverings or the coverings themselves constitute an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wagoner v. BargerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. LoweyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  3. In Re Joseph W. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Syntex Pharmaceuticals International, Ltd. v. K-Line Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  5. ITT Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API