Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co.

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided May 15, 1895Published

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

This is a motion to dissolve a temporary restraining Sy non-.sent of parties it was subniitted in oral testimony.

*30The petition alleges substantially that the defendant is a corporation under the laws of Ohio, and is the owner of and engaged in operating a certain line of steam railway between the cities of Cincinnati and Hamilton; that in the operation of said railway, the defendant acts as a common carrier; that the plaintiff is a resident of Hamilton; that for many years past the defendant has had in full force certain rules and regulations regarding the sale of commutation tickets between…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. FraloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Merrill v. . GrinnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Metz v. California Southern RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API