Legal Opinion

County of Cass v. Lee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1935No. Docket No. 44, Calendar No. 38,138PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 1193 et seq., are specific in their provisions for deposit of county funds. Under the statute the bond at bar expired December 31, 1932. It was the duty of the board of supervisors to designate depositories for the two-year period beginning January 1, 1933. ' The bid of the five banks of the county, filed October 18, 1932, was provided for by statute and covered the ensuing two years after December 31st. It was the duty of the board to accept or reject the bid. If it accepted, it would contract for the safe keeping of the funds and arrange the depository bond. If it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. American Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of PensacolaSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. Pacific County v. Illinois Surety Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1916
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. School Dist. Bd. of Ed.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Commercial Movie Rental, Inc. v. Larry Eagle, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
  3. Wyoming Township v. HekmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API