Legal Opinion

Francis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 25, 1919No. A-3290PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Creek County; Gaylord R. Wilcox, Judge. Mrs. M. Francis was convicted of keeping a bawdy-house, and she appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The plaintiff in error, Mrs. M. Francis, hereinafter called defendant, was charged with keeping a feawdyhouse, found guilty, and her punishment fixed at a fine of $500. To reverse the judgment rendered, she prosecutes this appeal.

Several errors are assigned and argued in defendant’s brief; but, from the view we entertain of the case, redeem it necessary to review only the error assigned, “That the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the evidence,” a motion, in effect, requesting a directed verdict for the defendant.

The evidence shows conclusively that the general repu- . tation of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Putman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Frazier v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cherry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Blakemore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Barngrover v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. State v. GreenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API