Legal Opinion

Kowatch v. Darnell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1958No. Docket 43, Calendar 46,413PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Plaintiffs Kowatch owned a parcel of property and plaintiff Snrine owned one abutting it on the north. Somewhat south was property leased by defendant Ray Darnell, Jr., and wife, Bessie. The defendant State highway commissioner held title to a strip of land bordering on the west the properties of plaintiffs and extending south to include an area immediately west of the piece leased by the Darnells. This strip was excess land, not needed for highway purposes, which the commissioner intended to sell. Plaintiffs and the Darnells desired to purchase it together. While there is dispute about it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kinyon v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Nisbett v. MilnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Development Corporation v. KirkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. Olson v. Aegis Mortgage Corp. (In Re Bloxsom)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  3. Moyer v. Edlund (In Re Vandenbosch)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. Cook Self-Trusteed Living Revocable Trust v. Joshua SellersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Larry D JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API