Protest 905374-G of Draeger Shipping Co.
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keefe, J.
It appeared that the merchandise was exported to London and returned, and that two of the three documents required by article 392, Customs Regulations of 1931, were duly filed with the collector, but that the certificate of outward shipment was not filed, the parcel post receipt having been lost. However, a duplicate receipt was obtained and admitted in evidence. On the authority of United States v. Coastwise Steamship & Barge Co. (9 Ct. Cust. Appls. 216, T. D. 38047) and Abstract 38432 it was held that the regulations were substantially complied with and the protest was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Coastwise Steamship & Barge Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goldkamp v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Nanco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- American Express Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965