Legal Opinion

Protest 905374-G of Draeger Shipping Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided April 24, 1939No. 41131PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared that the merchandise was exported to London and returned, and that two of the three documents required by article 392, Customs Regulations of 1931, were duly filed with the collector, but that the certificate of outward shipment was not filed, the parcel post receipt having been lost. However, a duplicate receipt was obtained and admitted in evidence. On the authority of United States v. Coastwise Steamship & Barge Co. (9 Ct. Cust. Appls. 216, T. D. 38047) and Abstract 38432 it was held that the regulations were substantially complied with and the protest was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Coastwise Steamship & Barge Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goldkamp v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Nanco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. American Express Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API