Davis v. Kingsbury

Memorandum. We affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion at the Appellate Division. As that court concluded, ‘ ‘ the essential similarity of the proof offered on both hearings made the second a mere request for a rehearing.” Accordingly, the denial of the petitioner’s second application, in 1966, did not commence anew the four-month period within which review of the respondents’ determination—originally rendered in April, 1965—could be sought.