Legal Opinion

Brown v. Union Pac. R. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1930No. 4826PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEphraim Hanson, J.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries suffered by respondent by being struck by one of the cars of appellant. The verdict was for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

The appellant has assigned fifteen errors, but has argued only four of them. Under the rule established, the assignments of error not argued are deemed waived, and will not be considered.

The first two assignments relate to the refusal of the trial court to grant a directed verdict; the third relates to the refusal of the court to give a requested instruction; and the fourth relates to the refusal of the court to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Warner v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. StickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Teakle v. San Pedro, L. A. & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  5. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Jensen v. GerrardUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Buckley v. COXUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Wm. H. Pollett v. D. R.G.W.R. Co. and B.P. DelongUtah Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API