Legal Opinion

In re Processed Egg Prods. Antitrust Litig.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 2018No. MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION No. 08-md-2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pratter, United States District Judge

INTRODUCTION 1

This is a straightforward case of statutory interpretation where the plain language dictates the result. After ten years of incubating, and on the eve of closing arguments of a month-long trial, the parties suggest that the outcome of the case hinges on the meaning of one word in a little-used 1922 statute partially protecting farmers from antitrust laws. The Court is called upon to answer the deceptively simple question: how should one calculate the "value" of something?

In a certain sense, value is ephemeral. There are many types of value.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. National Broiler Marketing Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  5. Ewald Bros., Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc., a Kansas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API