Cropp v. Woleslagel
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kaul, J.:
This is an original proceeding in mandamus wherein plaintiffs ask us to issue a peremptory writ directing the defendant to rescind an order made at a pretrial conference directing plaintiffs to disclose the policy limits of their liability insurance.
The issue is identical in all three of the above entitled cases and the parties have stipulated that the decision in No. 46,295 will be controlling.
Plaintiffs herein are defendants in an action pending in the District Court of Russell County. The action was brought to recover damages for injuries…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lucas v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Toppass v. Perkins' AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Muck, Administratrix v. ClaflinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
3Cited by6 opinions
- Newton v. A.C. & S., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Del Rio v. Northern Blower Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Nunn v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Mosca v. PenskyNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.