Legal Opinion

Ostrom v. Datz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1922No. Appeal, No. 95PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is a case-stated to determine whether plaintiff has a fee simple title t'o the land described in his agreement of sale to defendant; the latter denies that he possesses snch an estate. The court below decided plaintiff can convey a fee simple title and entered judgment in his favor; defendant appeals.

Robert M. Cavett died seized of the property in question, leaving a will in which he devised it to his wife in fee. After making a number of specific bequests he provided, “And as to the remainder of my money which shall remain after the payment of my debts and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reimer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Estate of JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Worst v. DeHavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Arnold's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Chamberlain v. MaynesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth State Emp. Ret. System v. Dau. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Williamson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Ingham's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Conlin EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Lonergan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API