Legal Opinion

Rhode v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1979No. 1-279A34PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWDERMILK, Presiding Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-appellant John E. Rhode (Rhode) brings this appeal arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty.

FACTS

Rhode was charged with criminal trespass and attempted voluntary manslaughter. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Rhode entered a plea of guilty to the charge of attempted reckless homicide. Before sentencing, Rhode filed his motion to withdraw his plea. He asserted, inter alia, that attempted reckless homicide is a non-existent crime.

ISSUE

We need consider only one issue in reviewing this case:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zickefoose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. MelvinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Beeman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. CarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Ill. Bell Telephone v. Ill. Comm. Com'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Humes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Anthony v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API