Kreimer v. Midland Industries, Inc.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, C. J.:

This was an action to enforce specifically the provisions of the contract. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiffs’ petition and they have appealed.

In the petition, filed April 18, 1947, plaintiffs allege that they reside at Piqua, Kan.; that defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of Kansas and is the corporate successor to Midland Investments, Inc.; that on February 13, 1944, and for a long time prior thereto, plaintiffs were engaged in the manufacture of toys at Piqua as a copartnership under the name of Habigar…