Legal Opinion

(PS) CSPC Dophen Corporation v. Hu

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 13, 2019No. 2:17-cv-01895Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CSPC DOPHEN CORPORATION, No. 2:17-cv-1895 MCE DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ZHIXIANG HU, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Defendant and counterclaimant, Dr. Zhixiang Hu, Ph.D., is proceeding in this action pro 18 se. Accordingly, this action has been referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 19 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). (ECF No. 216.) Pending before the court are defendant’s 20 motion to file an amended counterclaim, defendant’s motion to dismiss the third…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. Edward G. Eldridge v. Sherman BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API