Legal Opinion
Miller v. Saul
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 3, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2020-1817Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DARLENE M., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-1817 (RDM) MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Darlene M. brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking reversal of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for Social Security disability insurance benefits, or, in the alternative, remand for a new administrative hearing. Now before the Court are Magistrate Judge Harvey’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), Dkt. 24,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.