Legal Opinion

Randolph v. . Hughes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1883PublishedCited by 13 opinions

MotioN to set aside the probate of a will, heard at Spring Term, 1882, of Northampton Superior Court, before Bennett J. The court refused the motion, and the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The receipt, in form of and purporting to be the will of Samuel Calvert, on the 2d day of February, 1882, was produced before the probate judge by the executor, W. H. Hughes, and proved without citation or notice to the heirs-at-law or next of kin of the deceased, and letters testamentary issued. On the 4th day of the next month two of his children, (Mar-giana M. Randolph and Eliza C. Barrow) appeared in said court and entered their caveat to the probate, and gave bond as required by law to secure'the costs incurred, in case of their failure to prosecute their suit with effect.

The probate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Syme v. . BroughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. King v. KinseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Will of HedgepethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. In Re Will of RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. In Re Will of EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. In Re the Purported Last Will & Testament of BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. In Re Will of BeauchampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API