Gladney v. Gladney

(after stating the case as above). Appellant insists that to entitle ap-pellee to maintain his suit against her in the 'district court of Panola county it must have appeared that he had resided in that county for six months next preceding the filing of his' petition. She insists, further, that it did not so appear, and that the court below therefore erred when he rendered judgment in ap-pellee’s favor. -

Undoubtedly the law is as appellant states it to be (article 4631, R. S. 1925; Dickinson v. Dickinson (Tex. Civ. App.) 138 S. W. 205; Lawler v. Lawler (Tex. Civ. App.) 15 S.W.(2d) 684), and…