Ambro v. Coveney
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed, without costs, and matter remanded to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein: We treat the appellant’s cross motion in the proceeding, then properly pending in the court, as a substantial compliance with the requirements of section 335 of the Election Law as to form and timeliness of assertion. This assertion was served and filed before the time for the commencement of a proceeding had expired and, indeed, before the Board of Elections acted on the nominating petition. All of the necessary parties to such a proceeding, as determined by…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Halloway v. BlakelyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Pauly v. MahoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Rodriguez v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Straniere v. CutoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Diaz v. SachsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.