Legal Opinion
Hymel v. Central Farms & Shipping Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided December 2, 1935No. 33180PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’NIELL, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff brought suit to foreclose a mortgage via ordinaria. The defendant applied to the judge for a moratorium, under the provisions of Act No. 159 of 1934. In response to the rule to show cause why the moratorium should not be granted, the plaintiff filed several exceptions and an answer. After a trial of the rule, on the exceptions and answer, the judge rendered a judgment rejecting the defendant’s demand for a moratorium; and the defendant appealed from the judgment. Thereafter, the Legislature, in the Second Extraordinary Session of 1934, enácted a new…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Doss v. Board of Com'rs of Mermentau Levee Dist.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- State ex rel. Broussard v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Cooper v. HodgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fullilove v. US Casualty Company of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Dripps v. DrippsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Wood v. Zor, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- City of New Orleans v. RymanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Moncla v. City of LafayetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.