Legal Opinion

Howington v. Waters

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1952No. 4500_1Published

1Per curiam

The Petitioner, an inmate of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary at McAlester, under life sentence for murder, applied to the District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that his conviction was brought about by framed evidence, to which the prosecuting attorney was a party. In its response, the State of Oklahoma, referring to the litigation in Howington v. State, 30 Okl.Cr. 243, 235 P. 931 and Id., 35 Okl. Cr. 352, 250 P. 941, and the application for a writ of habeas corpus in the Oklahoma Criminal Court of Appeals in which the same issues were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Odell v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. Howington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Sampsell v. People of State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Maxwell v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  5. Howington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API