Legal Opinion

Mount Laurel Township v. LOCAL FINANCE BD., DEPT. OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 16, 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the Appellate Division opinion, reported at 166 N. J. Super. 254 (1978). Only under limited circumstances, not here pertinent, may a municipal expenditure be made prior to an appropriation. See, e. g., Home Owners Construction Co. v. Borough of Glen Rock, 34 N. J. 305, 315-316 (1961); Essex Cty. Bd. of Taxation v. City of Newark, 73 N. J. 69, 74 (1977).

Por affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford, Schreiber and Handler — 7.

For reversal — Fone.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Owners Construction Co. v. Borough of Glen RockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Essex County Board of Taxation v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Mount Laurel Township v. LOCAL FINANCE BD., DEPT. OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Atlantic City v. Cynwyd InvestmentsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. County of Morris v. SkokowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Square Brighton v. Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  4. Rumana v. County of PassaicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  5. Passaic Education Ass'n v. Passaic Bd. of Ed.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977