Legal Opinion
Kennison v. Kanzler
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1925No. 4200PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, District Judge.
The established facts in this suit are that, on the 7th day of October, 1920, Thomas Kanzler was employed by the Clay Products Manufacturing Company, and as such employé was injured on said date. On the 17th of December, 1920, a receiver was appointed for the Clay Products Manufacturing Company in the District Court in equity and took charge of the assets of the company. Application was made by Kanzler for compensation under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the state of Ohio (Gen. Code, §§ 1465 — 37 to 1465—108), and the compensation was allowed and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Marshall v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Barlum Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Pyrites Co. v. Davison Chemical Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1933
- In Re Rodgers & Garrett Timber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1927
- First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. BernardinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Chapman v. First Nat. Bank of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.