Legal Opinion
Panici v. Rodriguez
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 1997No. 94-CV-1168PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
Appellant William F. Panici appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration and to reinstate his complaint which was dismissed, sua sponte, due to Ms failure to appear at an initial scheduling conference. We reverse.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
On April 2,1993, appellant William F. Pan-ici filed a complaint against appellees Dago-berto Italo Rodriguez and Italo Contractors, Inc., alleging breach of a home improvement contract, and the failure of appellees to have obtained the required home improvement license from the District of Columbia. Appel-lees filed an answer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Taylor v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Starling v. Jephunneh Lawrence & AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Braxton v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Durham v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Johnson v. Lustine Realty Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- TURQUOISE WYLIE v. GLENNCREST.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Tennille v. TennilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Mourning v. APCOA Standard Parking, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Lester v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Tennille v. TennilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002