Legal Opinion

Nesbit v. . Kafer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

These questions are presented as decisive of this appeal :

1. Where in a proceeding instituted in Beaufort County a drainage district, comprising lands lying in both Beaufort and Craven counties, is duly created and organized in accordance with the Drainage Act, sub-chapter III, chapter 94, of the Consolidated Statutes of 1919-1924, sections 5312, el seq., as amended, and the assessment rolls showing the assessments placed against each tract of land in the district for payment of bonds issued by the district, have been made and filed in each county, are such assessments, as they become due,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sanderlin v. LukenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Drainage Commissioners v. WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Drainage Commissioners of Washington County District, No. 4 v. Eastern Home & Farm Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Long Creek Drainage District v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Sanderlin v. . LukenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Raleigh v. Mechanics & Farmers BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. In re Albemarle Drainage District, Beaufort County No. 5Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Robeson County Drainage District No. 4 v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. White v. PateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API