Legal Opinion

City of Miami v. Arostegui

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 12, 1993No. 91-675PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

616 So.2d 1117 (1993)

CITY OF MIAMI, Self-Insured, Appellant,

v.

Frank AROSTEGUI, Appellee.

No. 91-675.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 12, 1993.

A. Quinn Jones, III, City Atty., and Kathryn S. Pecko, Asst. City Atty., and Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellant.

Mark L. Zientz, of Williams & Zientz, Miami, for appellee.

ORDER ON MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE

2Per curiam

Appellant, City of Miami, has filed a motion asking this court to recall its mandate. The City asserts three legal arguments for why this court should recall its mandate. First, the City argues that this court lost jurisdiction to…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jollie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Price v. McCordSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Lelekis v. LilesSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  5. Payne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. HallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. State v. MitchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Freedom Insurors v. MD MOODY & SONSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. E.D.S. Federal Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API