Legal Opinion
Skarnulis v. Diversified Financial Consulting, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 2, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 94-74656Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD
GADOLA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action to enforce an arbitration award against defendants. Before the court is defendants’ motion to vacate the arbitration award. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) (E.D.Mich. Jan. 1, 1992), the court shall decide the motion without entertaining oral argument.
I. Facts
On December 6, 1991, William and Doris Skarnulis submitted a claim for arbitration with the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”), alleging numerous claims against defendants. In addition…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- The Anaconda Company, Aluminum Division v. District Lodge No. 27 of the International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. J.V.B. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Executone Business Systems Corp. v. IPC Communications, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Sanders-Midwest, Inc. v. Midwest Pipe Fabricators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.