Legal Opinion
Gillett-Netting v. Barnhart
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided November 6, 2002No. CV 02-014 TUC JMRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROLL, District Judge.
Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment by Plaintiff Rhonda Gillett-Netting and Defendant Jo Anne B. Barnhart in her capacity as Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner). Both sides agree that the facts are undisputed. This order addresses whether Plaintiffs two minor children, who were conceived by means of an in vitro fertilization procedure performed more than ten months after Plaintiffs husband’s death, are entitled to receive benefits as his survivors under the Social Security Act (Act). For the reasons set forth below, they are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jimenez v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bowen v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gillett-Netting v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Gillett-Netting v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Finley v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2009