Legal Opinion

Gap, Inc. v. Stone International Trading, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 13, 1997No. 93 Civ. 638 (SWK)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*586 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

In this action for unauthorized use of the “Gap” trademark, unfair competition and violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), plaintiff The Gap, Inc. (“The Gap” or “Gap”) moves to dismiss its complaint without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Defendants Stone International Trading, Inc. (“Stone International”) and Johnathan Simon cross-move for costs and attorneys’ fees, as well as sanctions. For the reasons set forth below, The Gap’s motion to dismiss the complaint without…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Aventis Pasteur, Inc. v. SkevofilaxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. BD v. DeBuonoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. Geltzer v. Original Soupman Inc. (In re Soup Kitchen International Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  4. Team Obsolete Ltd. v. A.H.R.M.A. Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  5. Federal Insurance Co. v. Speedboat Racing Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API