Margaret E. Doolin and Claire Welt, Individually and as Co-Executors of the Estate of Thomas J. Doolin, Deceased v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises the issue whether the United States government is entitled to a windfall of four years’ interest, resulting from its own nondelivery of a tax refund check. Plaintiffs Margaret E. Doolin and Claire Welt, individually and as co-executors of the estate of Thomas J. Doolin, deceased, appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Thomas J. McA-voy, J., dismissing their complaint against the United States government. Plaintiffs’ complaint sought, among other things, approximately $20,000 in interest from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Meckel v. Continental Resources Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Guy F. Atkinson Company of California and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Dresser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
- Doolin v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1990
3Cited by13 opinions
- Konst v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr. And Constance P. Godfrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Kasper v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
- Richardson v. WetzelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Exxon Mobil Corp. & Affiliated Cos. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.