Legal Opinion

Margaret E. Doolin and Claire Welt, Individually and as Co-Executors of the Estate of Thomas J. Doolin, Deceased v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 1, 1990No. 422, Docket 90-6165PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

This appeal raises the issue whether the United States government is entitled to a windfall of four years’ interest, resulting from its own nondelivery of a tax refund check. Plaintiffs Margaret E. Doolin and Claire Welt, individually and as co-executors of the estate of Thomas J. Doolin, deceased, appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Thomas J. McA-voy, J., dismissing their complaint against the United States government. Plaintiffs’ complaint sought, among other things, approximately $20,000 in interest from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meckel v. Continental Resources Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Guy F. Atkinson Company of California and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Dresser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  4. Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
  5. Doolin v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Konst v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr. And Constance P. Godfrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Kasper v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
  4. Richardson v. WetzelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. & Affiliated Cos. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API