Legal Opinion

Herbert v. Herbert

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 29, 1973No. 19560PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Chief Justice:

Theodore W. Herbert, the appellant herein, brought this action for a divorce a vinculo matrimonii from his wife, Elizabeth Rogers Herbert, the respondent herein, on the ground of habitual drunkenness; Section 20-101(4) of the Code. He also alleges that several children were born of the marriage, all of whom are emancipated except the minor son, Theodore W. Herbert, Jr., age fifteen. He alleges that this minor son should be allowed to choose the parent with whom he wishes to live.

The respondent, by her answer and counterclaim, denied that she was a habitual drunkard and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Porter v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  3. Cowan v. CowanSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Lowe v. LoweSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  5. Skinner v. SkinnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spence v. SpenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  2. Clardy v. ClardySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Fort v. FortSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Page v. PageSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  5. Kendall v. KendallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API