Legal Opinion

Matter of Burke v. Cohen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In the light of fuller experience the distinction drawn by this court in People ex rel. Ward v. Scheu (167 N. Y. 292) between vacancies in offices created by the Constitution and vacancies in other city offices has proven impracticable. Inroads into the rule of that case create constant doubt. We now hold that article X, section 5, of the Constitution applies to all elective city offices.

The order should be affirmed without costs.

Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Ward v. . ScheuNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Radich v. Council of the City of LackawannaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Roher v. DinkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Matter of Ross v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Haggerty v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  5. Matter of Mott v. KrugNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API