Scott v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice ROSS.
Michael L. Scott was found guilty by a jury of indecency with a child by contact. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 21.11(a)(1) (Vernon 2003). The jury assessed punishment at seven years’ imprisonment. Scott appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction and the trial court’s refusal to include a charge on assault by offensive or provocative contact. We affirm.
Sufficiency of the Evidence
Scott was convicted of indecency with his stepdaughter, A.H., eleven years old at the time Scott last touched her. The jury heard A.H.’s initial interview…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
- Duke v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
- State v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Alexander Ulysses Chabrier v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019
- Allan Santiago Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.