Legal Opinion

Seagar v. New York & C. Mail Steamship Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 21, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel for demurrage and for extra compensation for handling freight.

1Opinion of the Court

.BROW X, District Judge.

The contract in the charter party to discharge with “customary dispatch'’ is fulilllwl if the vessel is afforded the customary facilities for speedy discharge. Steamship Co. v. Dempsey, [1892] 1 Q. B. 854. To the present case there were but two consignees of the hemp cargo, though the three bills of lading specified muneroun lots of different marlin and numbers. All the hump, however, was directed by orders from the receivers to the name storehouse. The evidence shows that the customary mode of handling cargoes of hemp la that the bales are not removed until all have…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Providence Washington Ins. v. BowringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hinckley v. Wilson Lumber Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1913
  2. Ackerlind v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API