Legal Opinion

Tongue v. Tongue

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1984PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*810OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Both plaintiff and defendant agreed on the record in open court not to contest the allegations of each other’s claims for divorce and to take “a mutual divorce against one another.” After receiving competent oral proof of the grounds for divorce, in accordance with section 211 of the Domestic Relations Law, the court adjudged plaintiff and defendant to be absolutely divorced. Inasmuch as defendant received precisely what he had requested and stipulated to, he is not an aggrieved party within the…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. Roldan v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Saleh v. SalehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Imor v. ImorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Fishkin v. FishkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. In re the Guardianship of Janet L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API