Hannah v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JORDAN, District Judge.
This is a diversity action removed by the defendant from State Court to this Court; it involves claims of sex discrimination brought under the law of the State of Tennessee, T.C.A. §§ 4-21-101, et seq. On March 15,1989, the Court entered an Order [Doc. 10] requiring the parties to show cause why the plaintiffs jury demand should not be stricken in light of the lack of any provision allowing a jury trial under T.C.A. §§ 4-21-101, et seq., which was enacted to enforce “the policies embodied in the federal Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 1968, and 1972, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NovotnySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Smith County Education Ass'n v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Third Nat. Bank v. American Equitable Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Larry Sneed v. The City of Red Bank, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- DiCentes v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998