Legal Opinion

Hannah v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided April 21, 1989No. CIV-3-88-902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JORDAN, District Judge.

This is a diversity action removed by the defendant from State Court to this Court; it involves claims of sex discrimination brought under the law of the State of Tennessee, T.C.A. §§ 4-21-101, et seq. On March 15,1989, the Court entered an Order [Doc. 10] requiring the parties to show cause why the plaintiffs jury demand should not be stricken in light of the lack of any provision allowing a jury trial under T.C.A. §§ 4-21-101, et seq., which was enacted to enforce “the policies embodied in the federal Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 1968, and 1972, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NovotnySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Smith County Education Ass'n v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Third Nat. Bank v. American Equitable Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Larry Sneed v. The City of Red Bank, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. DiCentes v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API