Legal Opinion

Ex parte Strange

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1881No. 10,702PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application to be admitted to bail upon writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

Morrison, C. J.:

The petitioner is being prosecuted by information, filed in the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, for the crime of *417murder, and is brought before me on a writ of habeas corpus, for the purpose of obtaining an order admitting him to bail.

By Article i, Section 6, of the Constitution, it is declared that " all persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital offenses where the proof is evident or the presumption great.” By Section 1285 of the Penal Code it is provided that “ if the offense charged is punishable with death, the officer arresting the defendant…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex parte SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
  2. Dennery v. Superior Court of Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Clark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Ex Parte FirminCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API