Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burger v. Board of School Directors

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 2003No. 8 WAP 2003Published

1DissentJustice Nigro

I respectfully dissent from the majority because I believe that the Board of School Directors of the McGuffey School District (the “Board”) did not have the right to suspend Appellant Anthony Burger without pay or benefits pending his termination hearing and that Appellant properly sought mandamus relief from that action.

Pursuant to the Public School Code (the “Code”), superintendents may only be removed from office based on charges of misconduct or neglect if a majority of the board of school directors votes for such a removal following a hearing. See 24 P.S. § 10-1080. In my view, this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rike v. Commonwealth, Secretary of EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Mulligan v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Burns v. Board of Directors of the Uniontown Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Burger v. Board of School Directors of McGuffey School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Giacomucci v. Southeast Delco School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API