Legal Opinion

Henderson v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1961No. 2725PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Acting Judge.

We are asked to reverse a decision denying a motion to vacate a forfeiture of collateral.

Appellant was arrested and charged with an indecent act. He was released on bail and when he appeared with counsel at the prosecutor’s office the next day it was arranged to change the charge to disorderly conduct and permit him to post and forfeit collateral of $50. This was done. More than a month later new counsel appeared for him and filed a motion to vacate the forfeiture. In the motion he alleged that he did not realize that he had forfeited the collateral and that he thought he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolina Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  2. Campbell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Guest v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patrick Kincaid v. Government of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. American Bankers Insurance Co. v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API