Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 1, 1945No. 6 Div. 290PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

The appeal is by the defendant from a decree of divorce.

No testimony is incorporated in the transcript, though noted as usual, the note on submission having been signed by the solicitors for the parties.

The certificate of the trial judge discloses “the testimony was ’given orally in Court and was not taken down by a Court reporter, or some other competent stenographer acting for him. Nor was the same requested or demanded. The testimony in the case cannot be transcribed in typewriting or certified to by a stenographer and filed in the cause because the testimony was not taken…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Robertson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Cox v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Linn v. LinnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ruck v. RuckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Eaton v. SheneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Edge v. BiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Garrett v. OddoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Mullis v. CALAWELLCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API