Prather v. State

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. Obviously an objection to the State using a witness whose name had not been furnished the defendant, in the absence of a prior demand for a list of witnesses, apparently predicated upon ‘Code Ann. § 27-1403 (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 430, 431) which is based upon a constitutional provision (Ga. L. 1945; Code Ann. § 2-105) and which provides that “Every person charged with an offense against the laws shall be furnished, on demand, previously to his arraignment, with a copy of the accusation, and a list of the witnesses on whose testimony the charge against him is founded.…